This page has two jobs. First, it explains every line printed on the panel of the bag we sell, what each ingredient is, and what the research does and does not say about it, including who was in each study, at what amount and who paid for it. Second, and this is the part most advertising pages leave out, it lists the headlines we run, tells you which ones are exaggerated, and separates the small number of things that are genuinely supported by evidence from the many that are not.
You almost certainly arrived here from an advertisement. The headline you clicked was written by us and paid for by us to appear next to real news stories. It was designed to make you stop scrolling. Several of our headlines overstate what science actually shows, and a few attribute statements to experts who do not exist.
Everything on this site is a paid advertisement for a product we sell. If you buy through a link on any of our pages, we are paid a commission. That is the reason this site exists.
The product is a 2.12-ounce pouch of powder made and sold by Four Sigma Foods, Inc. of Santa Monica, California, as a dietary supplement. One scoop is three-quarters of a tablespoon, two grams, and the pouch holds thirty of them. Each scoop declares 500 micrograms of vitamin B12, 500 milligrams of a lion's mane extract, 300 milligrams of cacao powder, 250 milligrams of a cordyceps extract, 250 milligrams of a rhodiola extract and 200 milligrams of a bacopa extract, with organic blueberry powder listed under other ingredients with no amount. It is not a medicine, it is not meant for any medical condition, and no study has ever tested these six lines together in anyone. The label carries the standard statement that its claims have not been evaluated by the FDA. No food, drink or supplement on this page is a substitute for your own clinician.
If you are genuinely worried about your memory, the single most useful thing you can do is book an appointment with your own clinician. That costs you nothing from us, and a proper conversation about your nights, your hearing, what you take daily and your habits is worth more than anything we are selling. We would rather you close this page and make that call than buy something under a false impression.
These are the headlines we have run, grouped by the claim they make. The right-hand column is our own plain assessment. We have marked each family of headlines as Exaggerated, Partly true, Withdrawn, Our headline was wrong or Broadly supported.
| The headline as you saw it | What is actually behind it |
|---|---|
| "Mental Decline Begins When Seniors Can't Spell These 3 Words. Test Now""Top Doctors Say Mental Decline Begins When Seniors Can't Pronounce These 3 Phrases. Can You?""MDs Say Mental Decline Begins When Seniors Can't Pronounce These 3 Phrases. Can You?""Memory Decline Begins When Seniors Say These 3 Phrases (See The List)""Declining Memory Begins When Seniors Say These 7 Phrases. See Which Ones" | Exaggerated There is no set of three words, three phrases or seven phrases whose spelling or pronunciation marks the beginning of anything. Nothing "begins" at a word. Word tasks do appear inside the short memory checks clinicians use, but those checks are given in person and read alongside your history, what you take daily and your age. Failing a word online means nothing on its own: plenty of people stumble over a word when they are tired, nervous or being timed. "Top doctors" and "MDs" refer to no specific person. See section 4. |
| "Japan's Oldest Doctors Say Memory Loss Isn't Age: Just Avoid Drinking These 3 Beverages""Japan's Greatest Doctors Say Memory Loss Isn't Age: Just Avoid Drinking These 3 Beverages""Japan's Oldest Doctors Say Memory Loss Isn't Age: Just Avoid Eating These 3 Foods""Japan's Oldest Doctors Say Memory Loss Isn't Age: Just Stop Eating These 3 Foods" | Exaggerated No group of Japanese doctors issued this statement. There is no such panel, no such list, and no source we can point you to. Japan appears in the headline because it is widely associated with long life, which makes the claim feel credible. That is a marketing decision, not a citation. The second half is also wrong. Memory changes with age for everyone, and no diet removes that. What is true is narrower: certain long-term eating and drinking patterns travel with faster slippage on thinking tests in large population studies. [1] Association is not proof of cause, and "just avoid these three" is not how any of it works. |
| "Nobel Prize's Doctors Say Memory Loss Isn't Age: Just Stop Eating These 3 Foods" | Withdrawn We retract this one outright. No Nobel laureate has endorsed this page, this product, or any list of three foods on our behalf. Attaching the Nobel Prize to an advertisement implies an authority that does not exist and we should not have run it. |
| "The Overlooked Boxed Cereal Now Tied to 8 Out of 10 Memory Cases" | Our headline was wrong There is no such statistic. No study ties any cereal to eight out of ten cases of anything, "memory cases" is not a category any researcher uses, and no cereal has been "overlooked" by anyone: the sugar figure is printed on the side of every box. The number was invented for the headline and we withdraw it. See section 3 for the honest version, which is duller and shorter: what you eat over years matters more than any single box. |
| "Brain Experts Now Say These 3 Cereals Age the Brain Faster Than Time""Scientists Now Say This 1 Cereal Ages the Brain Faster Than Time" | Exaggerated No food ages the brain "faster than time." That phrase was written for effect and it is not a finding from any study. It is also internally inconsistent: in one version it is three cereals, in another it is one, because the number is something we test for click-through, not something anyone measured. See section 3. |
| "Doctors Now Say This Popular Evening Drink Is Behind Memory Loss""Doctors Now Say This Popular Evening Drink Is Behind Brain Health Decline" | Partly true The "evening drink" is alcohol, and cutting back on it is a genuinely good idea for your nights and for a great deal else. What is overstated is the word "behind." No named doctor said this, alcohol is one contributing factor among many rather than the cause of memory slips, and no page selling a powder should be telling you otherwise. It is also worth saying plainly: the bag we sell contains no alcohol and no caffeine, and it does not offset either one. |
| "Doctors Name 5 Popular Drinks Now Tied To Memory Decline. Coffee Tops The List""Seniors: These 4 Drinks May Be Aging Your Brain Faster""The 4 Drinks Brain Doctors Want Seniors to Quit""Neurologists Say Cognitive Decline Isn't Age: Just Stop Drinking These 2 Popular Drinks""Doctors: 3 Popular Drinks Now Tied to Memory Loss in Seniors" | Exaggerated Notice that the count changes: two drinks, three, four, five. It changes because it is an advertising variable we rotate, not a number that came out of a study. No neurologist is named in any version, because none was consulted. "Coffee tops the list" is the clearest thing we have got wrong, and on this page it is worse than usual, because the product we sell is a powder whose own label tells you to stir it into coffee. The Food and Drug Administration cites 400 milligrams of caffeine a day, about two to three 12-ounce cups of brewed coffee, as an amount not generally associated with negative effects in most healthy adults. [2] See section 2. |
| "Brain Doctors: Quit These 4 Drinks Before It's Too Late" | Exaggerated No brain doctor was consulted for this headline, and there is no "too late." The deadline was invented to make you click. The four drinks are the ones in section 2: alcohol, sugar-sweetened soft drinks, energy drinks and sweetened coffee-shop drinks. Cutting back on them is sensible for your nights, your weight and your wallet. There is no evidence that quitting them on any particular day changes anything about your memory, and there is no age after which the change stops being worth making. |
| "Memory Slipping? Check These 4 Everyday Drinks First" | Partly true Half right, in the wrong order. If your memory is slipping, the first thing to check is not a drink; it is a conversation with your own clinician about your nights, your hearing and what you take daily, none of which is settled by changing what you pour. The four drinks are the everyday ones in section 2. Not enough plain water belongs on the list too, and it is the one with the clearest evidence behind it. [3] [4] |
| "America's Top Experts Say Mental Decline Isn't Aging: Just Avoid These 5 Kitchen Drinks" | Exaggerated The same construction as the "Japan's doctors" headline above, with the country changed. No panel of American experts issued this statement, and we cannot point you to one. Memory changes with age, and no drink removes that. The five kitchen drinks are in section 2, where the honest version of each is written out. "Just avoid" overstates what any of that evidence shows. |
| "Still Sharp at 90? Seniors Are Rethinking These 3 Everyday Foods" | Partly true The gentlest of our headlines, and still an overstatement. Nobody knows what keeps a particular person sharp at 90, and no single food does it. The three everyday foods are sugary breakfast cereals, processed meats and packaged baked goods, all in section 3. Eating less of them is part of the long, slow habits in section 5, and no food is a promise at any age. |
| "Seven Adaptogens in One Scoop of Morning Coffee" | Exaggerated This is our own headline about this bag and the count in it is not right. The panel on the back prints six lines with a weight beside each: lion's mane, cordyceps, cacao, bacopa, rhodiola and vitamin B12. Cacao is a food and vitamin B12 is a vitamin, so neither is an adaptogen by any definition anyone uses. The seventh name, organic blueberry powder, sits under other ingredients with no amount printed at all. The honest count is four plants, one food, one vitamin and a berry in the carrier section. See section 6. |
| "Two Grams of Tan Powder, and Which Shelf of the Pantry It Belongs On" | Broadly supported This is the headline of our own article about this bag, and it promises nothing beyond what the article does: it sorts every line of the panel onto the kitchen shelf where it would live. That sorting checks out against the bag itself. Cacao and the blueberry powder are foods; the lion's mane and cordyceps come from foods but are printed as extracts with no concentration ratio; bacopa and rhodiola are herb extracts you would not find at a grocer; and the vitamin B12 is the same form used in fortified foods, at 500 micrograms. The headline does not say the powder works. On the amounts, see section 6: the lion's mane is at a sixth of the 3.2 grams a day used for twelve weeks in thirty-one adults over 50, [5] and the bacopa is at two-thirds of the 300 milligrams used for twelve weeks in adults over 55 and over 65. [6] [7] |
| "Neurologists Name 5 Popular Prescriptions Now Tied to Memory Decline" | Partly true, and the one not to act on alone No neurologist named a list for us, and we will not print one. What is true is that pharmacists keep lists of everyday products, some sold over the counter, that are often a poor fit after 65, and that a yearly look at everything you take is worth having. But an advertisement is the worst possible reason to change anything a clinician gave you: never stop or change it because of something you read in an ad, including ours. Put everything you take in one bag, this pouch included, and ask your pharmacist. See the box at the end of section 2. |
An honest answer: these headlines appear beside real news stories, competing for attention with everything else on the page, and dramatic phrasing gets clicked. That is the incentive, and we are subject to it like every other advertiser.
It is also why this page exists. Once you are here, you are entitled to know exactly which claims we can stand behind and which ones were written to get your attention. Everything below is the sober version.
Our headlines have referred, in different versions, to "3 beverages", "4 drinks", "5 popular drinks", "2 popular drinks" and "this popular evening drink" without ever naming them. Here is the complete list of what we were pointing at, and what the research actually supports for each one. Where a study is cited, it is observational unless stated otherwise: it can show that two things travel together in a population, not that one causes the other.
This is the "popular evening drink" · Best-supported of the group
What the research says. Of everything our advertisements point at, drinking is where the case is strongest, and it is a case built on long observation of large groups rather than on any trial. Alcohol also disturbs your nights and interacts with a great many everyday products.
Honest verdict. Cutting back on alcohol has the strongest case of anything on this list. It is still not "the cause" of memory slips, and no amount of cutting back is a promise.
About the product we sell. It contains no alcohol. It is a two-gram scoop of powder you stir into a drink, once a day.
Important. If you drink heavily every day, do not stop abruptly on your own. Ask your clinician how to cut back safely.
Part of the "3 popular drinks" and "4 drinks" · Partly supported
What the research says. Soft drinks sit on the ultra-processed shelf, and the eating patterns that travel with better scores on thinking tests over years are built on the opposite of that shelf: vegetables, berries, nuts, whole grains, beans, fish and olive oil. [1]
Honest verdict. A reasonable thing to cut down on, mostly for reasons that have nothing to do with a dramatic headline. Replacing them with water is a cheap, low-risk change with its own evidence behind it. [3]
Often the "surprising" drink in our ads · No evidence we can stand behind
What the research says. We are not aware of a study that gives a clear answer about artificially sweetened soft drinks and everyday memory, and we cite none here.
Honest verdict. Unresolved, and not a reason to panic. Anyone who tells you diet soda has been shown to harm your memory is going beyond the evidence.
About the product we sell. It is not a drink on its own. It is a powder that declares five calories and two grams of carbohydrate a scoop, and it carries no sweetener of any kind on its panel.
Part of the "4 drinks brain doctors want seniors to quit" · Indirect concern
What the research says. There is little direct research linking energy drinks to memory. The concern for older adults is more immediate: high caffeine loads combined with sugar can bring a faster heartbeat, palpitations, jitters, an upset stomach and a poor night. [2]
Honest verdict. Worth avoiding if you are over 65 or sensitive to caffeine, for those reasons rather than any proven memory effect. The powder we sell carries no caffeine at all, which the maker's own page makes a point of; what you stir it into is your own business.
The version of "coffee" our ads should have named · Partly supported
What the research says. These are sugary drinks that happen to contain coffee. Whatever applies to sugar-sweetened beverages applies to them. A large flavored frappé can carry as much added sugar as a soft drink.
Honest verdict. If our "coffee" headline had meant this, it would have been defensible. It did not, and we should have been specific.
Part of the "3 beverages" · Partly supported
What the research says. Same story: the sugar is the issue, not the tea or the fruit. Whole fruit behaves quite differently from fruit juice, which delivers the sugar without the fiber.
Honest verdict. Treat these as soft drinks, because nutritionally that is largely what they are. Worth noting here: the bag we sell lists organic blueberry powder under other ingredients, and a bowl of actual blueberries at breakfast costs less and is easier to count.
Named in our headline as the worst offender · Our headline was wrong
What the research says. None of the studies on this page is about ordinary black coffee or plain tea, and tea is a routine part of the eating patterns studied for memory. The Food and Drug Administration cites 400 milligrams of caffeine a day, about two to three 12-ounce cups of brewed coffee, as an amount not generally associated with negative effects in most healthy adults, and a 12-ounce cup holds between 113 and 247 milligrams. [2] The European Food Safety Authority reaches the same order of magnitude: single doses up to 200 milligrams and daily intakes up to 400 milligrams do not raise safety concerns for healthy adults, and caffeine in moderate amounts increases alertness. [8]
Honest verdict. "Coffee Tops The List" was a bad headline, and doubly so from a page selling a powder whose label says to stir it into coffee. If you drink coffee and enjoy it, and it does not cost you your nights, the evidence does not ask you to give it up. It is also worth knowing that if you feel sharper twenty minutes after a scoop in a cup of coffee, the caffeine in the cup is the better-documented explanation. [8]
We do not print a list, and you should not act on one from an advertisement. Do not stop, reduce or skip anything a clinician gave you because of this page or any of our headlines.
The right action is simple: put everything you take, including what you buy over the counter, into one bag with this pouch and take it to your pharmacist. Ask whether anything there is a poor choice at your age, and whether anything argues with the plants on this panel. That is a four-minute errand and it is worth more than anything else on this page.
The food headlines referred to "3 foods" and to "cereals": one cereal in some versions, three in others. Again, the number was ours, not a finding. Here is what was meant, and what stands behind it.
The "3 cereals" / "1 cereal" that "age the brain faster than time" · Partly supported
What the research says. Frosted, honey-coated and chocolate cereals are mostly refined starch and added sugar, and many carry more sugar per serving than a cookie. No study has found that any cereal "ages the brain faster than time." That phrase is ours and it is not defensible. What the evidence does support is the opposite pattern: in a three-year trial of 604 older adults, the group eating vegetables, berries, nuts, whole grains, beans, fish and olive oil improved their thinking scores, and so did a group simply eating a little less. [1]
Honest verdict. Reading the sugar figure on the box is a sensible habit. Plain oats, plain shredded wheat and unsweetened whole-grain cereals are inexpensive swaps. Incidentally, the label of the bag we sell suggests working a scoop into what you bake; our article suggests keeping it in the cup instead, because the label gives no amounts for baking and once it is in a muffin you no longer know how much you had.
The honest version of all our food headlines · Partly supported
What the research says. The pattern of what a person eats over years is what the better research looks at, and the pattern that came out ahead in the only randomized trial of its kind was built on ordinary groceries rather than on anything from a packet. [1]
Honest verdict. The pattern of your food over years matters more than any single item. That is a duller message than "these 3 foods", which is exactly why our headlines do not say it.
Usually one of the "3 foods" · Partly supported
What the research says. Processed meats sit on the same shelf as the packaged foods above, and they are not part of the eating pattern that did well in the trial. [1]
Honest verdict. Worth moderating. Not an emergency, and not undone by any supplement or any scoop of powder.
Usually one of the "3 foods" · Partly supported
What the research says. Fast food sits on the same shelf, and the same trial applies. [1]
Honest verdict. Same as above: pattern over years, not any one meal.
The refined-carbohydrate group · Partly supported
What the research says. The eating pattern most studied for memory is the one built on leafy greens, berries, beans, nuts, whole grains, olive oil and fish. In a three-year trial of 604 older adults, the group that ate that way and a group that simply ate a little less both improved their thinking scores, by about the same amount. [1] Those are ordinary groceries; eating them costs nothing extra and is untroubled by any of the cautions on this page.
Honest verdict. The useful advice was never "stop eating these 3 foods." It is "shift the overall pattern," which takes months and cannot be sold in a headline.
Drink less alcohol. Drink less sugar. Drink more plain water. [3] Keep your coffee, earlier in the day if it costs you your nights. Eat more like the pattern in the trial above (vegetables, whole grains, beans, nuts, olive oil, fish, berries) and less like a vending machine. Every one of those changes costs nothing extra, and none of them requires anything we sell.
Several of our headlines invite you to test yourself on words or phrases: spell these three words, pronounce these three phrases, see whether you say these seven phrases. There is no such validated test, and we cannot give you a real one, because a real one does not work that way.
What an actual memory check looks like. Clinicians use short structured checks. They do include word tasks: recalling three unrelated words after a delay, naming animals, repeating a sentence. But three things make them different from an online quiz:
These checks also produce false alarms. A bad night, trouble hearing, and simply being nervous all lower scores in people whose memory is fine. This is precisely why an online word quiz is meaningless: it has none of the context that makes the real check useful.
We are sorry. Take it as a prompt rather than a verdict: if the worry is real, bring it to your own clinician and ask for a proper memory check. If it was just a startling headline, the reassurance you are looking for cannot come from a quiz on an advertising page, including this one.
If we only had one section to be useful in, this would be it. None of these is a supplement, a pouch, or a list of three foods, and none of them can be sold to you by us.
These are unglamorous. They cannot be delivered in a headline, they take years, and they are, by a wide margin, the most useful things on this entire page.
What each line printed on the panel of Four Sigmatic Focus Mushroom Blend is, what it is traditionally used for, and what the cited research says, including who was in each study, at what amount and who paid for it. One scoop is three-quarters of a tablespoon, two grams, and the pouch holds thirty. Three notes on the panel itself. The six numbered lines add up to about 1,500 milligrams of the 2,000-milligram scoop, so roughly a quarter of it is the blueberry powder and whatever else makes up the rest, none of which carries a declared amount. The panel prints no standardization percentage and no concentration ratio for any of the extracts, so their strength is the maker's to declare and cannot be converted into the amounts used in the studies below. And two of the six numbered lines, cacao and vitamin B12, are not adaptogens by any definition, although the front of the pouch counts them among seven.
A vitamin found naturally only in animal foods — meat, fish, eggs and dairy — and in fortified products. The body absorbs it through a two-step process in the stomach and small intestine that becomes less efficient with age, which is why supplement doses are often many times the daily requirement: only a small percentage of a large oral dose is taken up.
What the research says. A Cochrane review of 14 trials in 27,882 cognitively healthy adults concluded that B-vitamin supplements, including vitamin B12, probably have little or no effect on global cognitive function up to five years.[10] That review says nothing about people who are actually short of B12; in the European Union the vitamin carries authorised claims that it contributes to normal psychological function, to normal functioning of the nervous system and to the reduction of tiredness and fatigue.
Amount per serving in Focus Mushroom Blend. 500 mcg (20,833 % of the Daily Value)
Good to know. No upper limit has been set, because unabsorbed vitamin B12 is not stored. A blood test is the only way to know whether you are short of it; ask your doctor rather than guessing.
An edible mushroom with long, white, downward-hanging spines that grows on older beech and oak trees in temperate forests across the Northern Hemisphere. It is eaten as food, especially in East Asia and the United States, with a texture often compared to crab or lobster.
Traditional and everyday use. Known as yamabushitake in Japan and houtougu in China, it has a long history of use as a food and in East Asian and Native American traditions.
What the research says. In a 12-week placebo-controlled trial of 31 healthy adults over 50, a daily lion's mane fruiting-body preparation (3.2 g/day) was associated with higher scores on a standard mental-status test compared with placebo.[5] A visual-retention test in the same trial did not change, and the dose was far larger than most blends and extracts deliver. In a separate pilot trial in 41 healthy adults aged 18 to 45, a single 1.8 g dose was associated with faster performance on the Stroop task an hour later, while 28 days of it produced only a non-significant trend on self-rated stress.[11]
Amount per serving in Focus Mushroom Blend. 500 mg (a sixth of the 3.2 g a day used in the 12-week trial in adults over 50)
Good to know. Generally regarded as safe as a food. Stomach discomfort, nausea and skin rash were reported by a few participants in one clinical study. Avoid if you are allergic to mushrooms.
An orange club-shaped fungus grown commercially on grain or in liquid culture, sold as a stand-in for the wild caterpillar fungus of Tibet, which is far too rare and expensive for a supplement.
Traditional and everyday use. The wild fungus has a long history in Chinese practice as a tonic; the cultivated species is a modern substitute.
What the research says. We did not register a randomized trial of cordyceps on memory or attention in healthy adults for this page; the human studies we saw were about exercise performance and were small or mixed.
Amount per serving in Focus Mushroom Blend. 250 mg
Good to know. Generally well tolerated as a food; ask a pharmacist if you take anything that affects the immune system or clotting.
The fermented, dried seed of the cacao tree, ground without roasting or alkalizing; the raw material of chocolate, rich in flavanols and a source of a little caffeine and theobromine.
Traditional and everyday use. Drunk as a bitter beverage in Mesoamerica for millennia; the powder in a supplement is a flavor and a source of flavanols.
What the research says. We did not register a memory trial of cacao for this page. Three hundred milligrams is a small pinch, about a tenth of a teaspoon; the flavanol trials in adults used gram-scale cocoa drinks.
Amount per serving in Focus Mushroom Blend. 300 mg
Good to know. Safe as a food. It carries a trace of caffeine and theobromine; the product is labeled caffeine-free because the amount is negligible.
A creeping perennial of wet ground and pond edges across India, with small oblong leaves and white to pale purple flowers. In some parts of India the name "brahmi" is also given to gotu kola, which is a different plant; some products list both.
Traditional and everyday use. One of the best-known plants of Ayurvedic practice, traditionally associated with memory, calm and sleep.
What the research says. This is the one ingredient on the tin with trials in the right age group. In 54 healthy adults aged 65 and older, 300 mg a day of a standardized extract for 12 weeks was associated with better delayed word recall and better performance on a task of ignoring distractions than placebo, with no effect on divided attention or working memory.[6] In 98 healthy adults over 55, the same daily amount for 12 weeks was associated with better verbal learning and delayed recall, while other measures did not differ.[7] A meta-analysis of nine such trials found faster performance on two attention-speed tests, by milliseconds, and called for a large well-designed trial.[12] All of that used standardized extracts in tablets for at least three months. A pinch of dried plant steeped in a twelve-ingredient tea blend, or a fraction of a milligram of glycosides in a spray, is not the same thing, and nobody has tested either.
Amount per serving in Focus Mushroom Blend. 200 mg (two thirds of the 300 mg a day used in the trials in adults over 55)
Good to know. The trials reported more stomach upset, looser stools, cramps and nausea than placebo.[7] Reference texts advise caution for anyone who takes anything daily for the body's own hormones, note it may slow the heart rate, and note it can affect how the organ that processes what you swallow handles some medicines. Talk to your doctor before use if you take anything daily.
A plant known as arctic root, golden root or rose root that grows in cold regions and at high altitude in Europe, Asia and North America. The root is the part used.
Traditional and everyday use. A long history of use in Russia, Scandinavia and other parts of Europe for fatigue and work performance.
What the research says. In a double-blind crossover study of 56 healthy young physicians on night duty, one tablet a day of a standardized extract was associated with better scores on tests of mental fatigue during the first two weeks.[13] The National Institutes of Health states there is not enough reliable evidence to say whether rhodiola is useful for any health-related purpose.
Amount per serving in Focus Mushroom Blend. 250 mg
Good to know. Possibly safe for up to 12 weeks; side effects reported include dizziness, headache, trouble sleeping and dry mouth. Little is known about safety in pregnancy or breastfeeding. Talk to your doctor before use if you take anything daily.
*These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. This information does not constitute medical advice and it should not be relied upon as such. This product is not a substitute for medication or other treatment prescribed by a physician or health care provider. Consult your doctor before starting any dietary supplement.
Set against the headlines that brought you here, this is the complete and honest position.
Things we cannot promise, and that nobody selling you a supplement can:
Things we can say honestly:
No. Those attributions are advertising language. No named or identifiable expert made those statements, and none has endorsed this product.
None of the studies on this page is about plain coffee, and our "Coffee Tops The List" headline overstated it. What is worth watching is added sugar in coffee drinks, and caffeine late enough in the day to cost you a night. The Food and Drug Administration cites 400 milligrams a day as an amount not generally associated with negative effects in most healthy adults. [2] The powder itself carries none.
No. The panel prints six lines with a weight beside each, and two of those six are a food (cacao) and a vitamin (B12), neither of which is an adaptogen. The seventh name, organic blueberry powder, is listed under other ingredients with no amount.
The bacopa. Its trials used 300 milligrams a day for twelve weeks in healthy adults over 55 and over 65, with better delayed recall and verbal learning than placebo and several other measures unchanged. [6] [7] A meta-analysis of nine trials in 518 people found faster attention speed and asked for a large well-designed trial. [12] This scoop carries 200 milligrams.
Five hundred milligrams of a fruiting-body extract, against the 3.2 grams a day used for twelve weeks by thirty-one healthy adults over 50 in the trial most often cited for it. [5] That is a sixth of the amount, and the trial itself was small and positive on one test only.
Yes, if you take anything daily. Take the pouch, and everything else you take, to your pharmacist before the first scoop.
Thirty mornings, at one scoop a day. Sixty grams divided by a two-gram scoop is thirty exactly.
You are keeping it. The 45-day return covers unopened items with the seal intact, so a pouch you have opened to taste cannot be sent back.
Not that we could use. The widget on the seller's product page belongs to the whole store, the reviews under it are about other products, and we found none that names this powder, so none appears on our pages.
A fair question. Do not take our word for it. The references below are real, published sources you can look up yourself, and nothing in sections 4 and 5 requires you to buy anything or trust us. If this page and our headlines disagree, believe this page.
No. There is nothing to sign up for, and you are welcome to read it, close the tab and never come back.
Yes, and you should. Every numbered reference below can be found by searching its authors and journal. For general information, the National Institute on Aging (nia.nih.gov) publishes plain-language material and sells nothing.
These are the sources behind the claims marked with a number above. Several are observational studies, which can show association but not cause. The lion's mane trial had thirty-one participants; the bacopa trials used a standardized extract at an amount this pouch does not reach; the rhodiola study ran in young clinicians on night duty and states no dose; the berry study used a concentrate; the fact sheets are the governments' own. None of them tested this pouch. We have deliberately not cited anything for the claims we describe as exaggerated, because there is nothing to cite.
Citing a study does not mean the study is about this product. The studies above tested one ingredient at a time, in other people, at amounts this pouch does not match, not the pouch itself; none of the research tested Four Sigmatic Focus Mushroom Blend, and none of it supports it.
This site is an advertising publication. The Honest Pantry Reader is not a news organization, is not affiliated with any news outlet whose page our advertisements appear on, and is not affiliated with the National Institutes of Health, the Nobel Foundation, the Food and Drug Administration, or any medical body, university or government agency named on this page. Logos and names of publishers appear in our reporting dashboards only to describe where advertisements were placed; they imply no endorsement whatsoever.
The product on this site is made and sold by Four Sigma Foods, Inc. of Santa Monica, California. Headlines used in our advertising are promotional and may be dramatized, generalized or exaggerated for attention. Where a headline conflicts with this page, this page is correct. Individual results, testimonials and endorsements do not represent typical results. We are compensated when readers purchase products through our links.
Medical disclaimer. Nothing on this page is medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Do not delay seeking professional advice, and do not stop or change anything a clinician gave you, because of anything you read here. If you are worried about memory or concentration, your own or a family member's, speak to a qualified healthcare professional. In an emergency, call your local emergency number.